From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932152AbXCKKwT (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:52:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932229AbXCKKwS (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:52:18 -0400 Received: from amsfep20-int.chello.nl ([62.179.120.15]:47488 "EHLO amsfep20-int.chello.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932152AbXCKKwS (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:52:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] swsusp: Stop using page flags From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Pavel Machek , LKML , Nigel Cunningham , Johannes Berg , Christoph Lameter , Nick Piggin In-Reply-To: <200703111117.27083.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200703111117.27083.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 11:52:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1173610325.5182.1.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 11:17 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > The following three patches make swsusp use its own data structures for memory > management instead of special page flags. Thus the page flags used so far by > swsusp (PG_nosave, PG_nosave_free) can be used for other purposes and I believe > there are some urgend needs of them. :-) > > Last week I sent these patches to the linux-pm and linux-mm lists and there > were no negative comments. Also I've been testing them on my x86_64 boxes for > a few days and apparently they don't break anything. I think they can go into > -mm for testing. > > Comments are welcome. These patches have my blessing, they look good to me, but I'm not much involved with the swsusp code, so I won't ACK them. Again, thanks a bunch for freeing up 2 page flags :-) Peter