Re: [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2

Mike Galbraith
2007-03-12T14:34:52Z

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 22:23 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:

> Mike the cpu is being proportioned out perfectly according to fairness as I
> mentioned in the prior email, yet X is getting the lower latency scheduling.
> I'm not sure within the bounds of fairness what more would you have happen to
> your liking with this test case?

It has been said that "perfection is the enemy of good". The two
interactive tasks receiving 40% cpu while two niced background jobs
receive 60% may well be perfect, but it's damn sure not good.

-Mike