From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
drepper@redhat.com, oleg@tv-sign.ru, sebastien.dugue@bull.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] change futex_wait() to hrtimers
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:19:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1173698386.13341.87.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070312110204.GD2231@elte.hu>
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 12:02 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Well I did convert futex_wait to an absolute timeout based version in
> > the subsequent incremental patch. I think that is OK?
>
> it still has the rounding artifacts: using timer_list there is no way to
> do a precise long sleep based on many small sleeps.
>
> even if this means more work for you (i'm sorry about that!) i'm quite
> sure we should take Sebastien's hrtimers based implementation of
> futex_wait(), and use the nanosleep method to restart it. There's no
> point in further tweaking the imprecise approach: whenever some timeout
> needs to be restarted, it's a candidate for hrtimers.
>
> until then, glibc already handles timeouts and restarts it manually.
This also allows us to add a seperate absolute time bases futex op,
which allows to remove the conversion of abstime to reltime in glibc.
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-12 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200703110814.l2B8EaI1007615@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
[not found] ` <20070312011259.3834A1801C4@magilla.sf.frob.com>
2007-03-12 9:10 ` [patch] change futex_wait() to hrtimers Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 9:16 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-12 11:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 11:13 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-12 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 11:29 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-12 11:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 11:52 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-12 12:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 12:36 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-12 11:19 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2007-03-12 11:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-12 11:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-12 10:58 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-12 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 11:20 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-12 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 14:12 ` Theodore Tso
2007-03-12 14:22 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-12 14:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-12 14:32 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-15 0:03 linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1173698386.13341.87.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=sebastien.dugue@bull.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox