From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752144AbXCPK1w (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:27:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753458AbXCPK1w (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:27:52 -0400 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170]:24783 "EHLO mgw-ext11.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752144AbXCPK1v convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:27:51 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/22 take 3] UBI: EBA unit From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haver@vnet.ibm.com, hch@infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20070315142410.371adbf0.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20070314151934.1112.70126.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070314152024.1112.15655.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070315110703.1c2dcce4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070315142410.371adbf0.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:21:08 +0200 Message-Id: <1174040468.31851.10.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-1.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2007 10:21:08.0168 (UTC) FILETIME=[CFD0A480:01C767B4] X-eXpurgate-Category: 1/0 X-eXpurgate-ID: 149371::070316122117-5FAFDBB0-19BDC4BB/0-0/0-1 X-Nokia-AV: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 14:24 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > /me repeats wish that Not Everything Should Be Sent to lkml. :( If you do statement like this, please, provide reasons why you say it for these patches and suggest something _constructive_. I do not see any point in this vague phrase. And please, note, I was directed here by David Woodhouse who is MTD maintainer because he thinks the patch is large and needs more people to look at it, not just him. > Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt > > Above: no "blank" line between the function name and its parameters. OK, I'll look at this again, thanks. -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)