From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S932569AbXCUQCv@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932569AbXCUQCv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:02:51 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932706AbXCUQCv
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:02:51 -0400
Received: from amsfep17-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.15]:15094 "EHLO
	amsfep18-int.chello.nl" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932569AbXCUQCu (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:02:50 -0400
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>, Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
       Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
       ck@vds.kolivas.org, Serge Belyshev <belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <1174489064.5379.42.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
References: <200703042335.26785.a1426z@gawab.com>
	 <200703172048.46267.kernel@kolivas.org>
	 <1174125534.7734.2.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
	 <200703172355.30989.a1426z@gawab.com> <45FEB54A.3040602@rtr.ca>
	 <1174321617.30876.69.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-04> <45FEBBF5.9060002@rtr.ca>
	 <1174322580.30876.72.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-04>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703192006130.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
	 <20070320061152.GW943@1wt.eu>  <1174377787.9756.21.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
	 <1174489064.5379.42.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:02:46 +0100
Message-Id: <1174492966.16411.1.camel@twins>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.9.92 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:57 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> 'f' is a progglet which sleeps a bit and burns a bit, duration depending
> on argument given. 'sh' is a shell 100% hog.  In this scenario, the
> argument was set such that 'f' used right at 50% cpu.  All are started
> at the same time, and I froze top when the first 'f' reached 1:00.

May one enquire how much CPU the mythical 'f' uses when ran alone? Just
to get a gauge for the numbers?