Re: [PATCH 2/16] vt-pure-colors.diff

Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-02T07:50:51Z

On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:04 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Apr 2 2007 14:49, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> >
> >Not too sure about this, the default palette is based on ANSI/ECMA
> >standards (at least for the first 8 colors). Also, this will have subtle
> >effects on the 16-color logo. Since your first patch already allows us
> >to change the palette, let's leave the default alone.
>
> Ok.
> But to note: xterm and anything graphical (including MS Windows)
> uses the anti-pale color (255,0,0) instead of (255,170,170).

Actually, what threw me off was index 4 in default_blu, which has a
value of 0x90. This looks weird to me, but I guess that is a typo. I
really have nothing against using 0, 0, 255 instead of 170, 170, 255 in
the intense version of the first 8.

Tony