From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751597AbXDDOtX (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:49:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753906AbXDDOtX (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:49:23 -0400 Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([217.160.111.169]:48468 "EHLO mail.holtmann.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751597AbXDDOtW (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:49:22 -0400 Subject: Re: MODULE_MAINTAINER From: Marcel Holtmann To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Rene Herman , Rusty Russell , Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <20070404123311.GA18552@infradead.org> References: <46138B4C.2050409@gmail.com> <20070404123311.GA18552@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:48:55 +0200 Message-Id: <1175698135.5815.447.camel@violet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Christoph, > > Can we have a MODULE_MAINTAINER to complement MODULE_AUTHOR? > > #define MODULE_MAINTAINER(x) MODULE_AUTHOR(x), please. > MODULE_AUTHOR really has meant maintainer in practice for ages, and it's > the only actually relevant for users information we should store. I agree. The actual author information belong into the files copyright header. The MODULE_AUTHOR should only show the current maintainer and its email address. However this might need some cleanup. Maybe it is time that we sync the MAINTAINERS file with the MODULE_AUTHOR tag. Regards Marcel