From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.21-rc5-git] make /proc/acpi/wakeup more useful
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:59:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1175759995.23121.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704031741.42273.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 08:41 +0800, David Brownell wrote:
> This updates /proc/acpi/wakeup to be more informative, primarily by
> showing
> the sysfs node associated with each wakeup-enabled device. Example:
>
> Device S-state Status Sysfs node
> PCI0 S4 disabled no-bus:pci0000:00
> PS2M S4 disabled pnp:00:05
> PS2K S4 disabled pnp:00:06
> UAR1 S4 disabled pnp:00:08
> USB1 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:03.0
> USB2 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:03.1
> USB3 S3 disabled
> USB4 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:03.3
> S139 S4 disabled
> LAN S4 disabled pci:0000:00:04.0
> MDM S4 disabled
> AUD S4 disabled pci:0000:00:02.7
> SLPB S4 *enabled
>
> Eventually this file should be removed, but until then it's almost the
> only
> way we have to tell how the relevant ACPI tables are broken (and
> cope). In
> that example, two devices don't actually exist (USB3, S139), one can't
> issue
> wakeup events (PCI0), and two seem harmlessly (?) confused (MDM and
> AUD are
> the same PCI device, but it's the _modem_ that does wake-on-ring).
>
Well, ACPI can't find the sysfs node for all the wakeup-enabled devices.
In fact, only pci and pnp devices can be found now.
ACPI needs the ability to distinguish all the physical devices, i.e. map
ACPI device to physical device nodes in sysfs, which I mentioned before.
Thanks,
Rui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-05 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-04 0:41 [patch 2.6.21-rc5-git] make /proc/acpi/wakeup more useful David Brownell
2007-04-05 7:59 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2007-04-05 10:58 ` David Brownell
2007-04-06 9:36 ` Zhang Rui
2007-04-06 15:43 ` David Brownell
2007-04-07 5:01 ` Greg KH
2007-04-07 20:08 ` David Brownell
2007-04-09 2:36 ` Zhang Rui
2007-04-09 5:35 ` David Brownell
2007-04-10 23:29 ` David Brownell
2007-04-11 0:10 ` David Brownell
2007-04-13 15:59 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-17 19:53 ` David Brownell
2007-04-17 21:57 ` David Brownell
2007-04-18 3:03 ` Greg KH
2007-04-18 3:25 ` David Brownell
2007-04-05 9:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-04-05 10:35 ` David Brownell
2007-04-25 19:22 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1175759995.23121.18.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox