Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix

Ingo Molnar
2007-04-07T09:47:17Z

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> > We do in on_each_cpu() unconditionally. I missed that.
>
> BTW, the on_each_cpu() in clock_was_set() is unnecessary, because
> timekeeping_resume() is always run on one CPU.

yes - but that's not the only place where we do clock_was_set(), and the
on_each_cpu() is necessary in every other case. So i think the right
solution was the patch i did: to split the resume functionality from the
clock_was_set() functionality.

Ingo