Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix

Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-07T09:50:07Z

On Saturday, 7 April 2007 11:47, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > > We do in on_each_cpu() unconditionally. I missed that.
> >
> > BTW, the on_each_cpu() in clock_was_set() is unnecessary, because
> > timekeeping_resume() is always run on one CPU.
>
> yes - but that's not the only place where we do clock_was_set(), and the
> on_each_cpu() is necessary in every other case. So i think the right
> solution was the patch i did: to split the resume functionality from the
> clock_was_set() functionality.

Agreed.

Rafael