From: ian <spyro@f2s.com>
To: cbou@mail.ru
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
Ondrej Zajicek <santiago@crfreenet.org>,
dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-discuss@handhelds.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:28:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1176712094.29389.191.camel@wirenth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070416031256.GA30153@zarina>
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 07:12 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Why? With current battery class we can do whatever everyone needs. No
> need for wrappers.
<cut>
> Because of your original design, simple batteries are stay simple, and
> no noticing that there is some "complicated" attributes exists at all.
> That's indeed great characteristic of that *universal* battery class.
Indeed. Im just trying to make sure we dont bloat an otherwise very
simple class. A word of caution only.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-16 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-11 23:25 [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-12 2:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-04-12 16:51 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-12 3:43 ` Greg KH
2007-04-12 12:25 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-12 13:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-12 13:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-04-12 14:15 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-12 14:24 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-04-12 14:36 ` [Kernel-discuss] " Paul Sokolovsky
2007-04-12 18:56 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-12 20:44 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-13 0:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-13 2:15 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-24 19:36 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-13 2:34 ` Shem Multinymous
2007-04-13 2:36 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-13 13:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-12 15:00 ` Shem Multinymous
2007-04-12 15:18 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-12 17:23 ` Shem Multinymous
2007-04-13 13:49 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-15 0:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-05-04 9:59 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-15 19:56 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-15 22:10 ` [Kernel-discuss] " Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-15 22:08 ` Ondrej Zajicek
2007-04-15 22:50 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-16 0:57 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-16 1:57 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-16 14:34 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-16 2:32 ` [Kernel-discuss] " ian
2007-04-16 3:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-16 8:28 ` ian [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1176712094.29389.191.camel@wirenth \
--to=spyro@f2s.com \
--cc=cbou@mail.ru \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=kernel-discuss@handhelds.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santiago@crfreenet.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox