From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: mikpe@it.uu.se
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Fw: [BUG 2.6.21-rc7] acpi_pm clocksource loses time on x86-64
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:12:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1176840764.15198.136.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070417100942.c990604b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 10:09 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I guess this counts as a regression.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:16:25 +0200 (MEST)
> From: Mikael Pettersson
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [BUG 2.6.21-rc7] acpi_pm clocksource loses time on x86-64
>
>
> The machine is an old Athlon64 laptop (Targa Visionary 811,
> OEMd as the Arima W720-K8, also sold as the eMachines m6805)
> with a VIA K8T800 chipset. ACPI is enabled.
>
> Up to kernel 2.6.20, time-keeping worked fine. In the
> x86-64 kernel, the clock source is listed as "jiffies".
>
> With current 2.6.21-rc7, the x86-64 kernel selects
> acpi_pm as its clock source. Unfortunately, with this
> clock time drifts and it loses several minutes per hour.
>
> What's strange is that the i386 kernel on the same
> machine (with similar .config) does not lose time
> while using the acpi_pm clock source.
Huh. Quite strange as its the same acpi_pm clocksource driver!
The only difference I see right off is that verify_pmtmr_rate() isn't
done on x86_64. Although I'd expect you'd see "PM-Timer running at
invalid rate" w/ the i386 kernel if it made a difference.
Could you send me the dmesg output for both the x86_64 and i386 kernels
you tried?
thanks
-john
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-17 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070417100942.c990604b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-17 20:12 ` john stultz [this message]
[not found] <200704291524.l3TFOL9j013216@harpo.it.uu.se>
2007-05-02 18:10 ` Fw: [BUG 2.6.21-rc7] acpi_pm clocksource loses time on x86-64 john stultz
2007-05-04 2:38 ` john stultz
2007-05-04 7:42 Mikael Pettersson
2007-05-08 19:14 ` Len Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-09 9:11 Mikael Pettersson
2007-05-10 18:52 ` john stultz
2007-05-13 21:30 Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1176840764.15198.136.camel@localhost \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox