From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756405AbXD1REI (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:04:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752595AbXD1REI (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:04:08 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:52324 "EHLO mail.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756405AbXD1REH (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:04:07 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team) From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: Michal Piotrowski Cc: stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Meyer In-Reply-To: <463375E5.5040108@googlemail.com> References: <463375E5.5040108@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:06:11 +0200 Message-Id: <1177779971.7646.271.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Subject : Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 > Submitter : Thomas Meyer > Status : Unknow Michal, I don't think this is a regression. What Thomas wanted to point out is, that the amarok / sound device is making the positive effect of dynticks moot, as it starts to trigger useless interrupts. Thomas, is my interpretation correct ? Did you check, which interrupt was increasing - i.e. was it the soundcard one ? tglx