From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
caglar@pardus.org.tr, Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
Zach Carter <linux@zachcarter.com>,
buddabrod <buddabrod@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 09:59:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177833575.9756.22.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070429065900.GB32281@elte.hu>
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 08:59 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
>
> > I don't know if Mike still has problems with SD, but there are now
> > several interesting reports of SD giving better feedback than CFS on
> > real work. In my experience, CFS seems smoother on *technical* tests,
> > which I agree that they do not really simulate real work.
>
> well, there are several reports of CFS being significantly better than
> SD on a number of workloads - and i know of only two reports where SD
> was reported to be better than CFS: in Kasper's test (where i'd like to
> know what the "3D stuff" he uses is and take a good look at that
> workload), and another 3D report which was done against -v6. (And even
> in these two reports the 'smoothness advantage' was not dramatic. If you
> know of any other reports then please let me know!)
I can tell you one thing, its not just me that has observed the
smoothness in 3d stuff, after i tried rsdl first i've had lots of people
try rsdl and subsequently sd because of the significant improvement in
smoothness, and they have all found the same results.
The stuff i have tested with in particular is unreal tournament 2004 and
world of warcraft through wine, both running opengl, and consuming all
the cpu time it can get.
and the thing that happens is simply that even when theres only that
process, sd is still smoother, but the significance is much larger once
just something starts, like if the mail client starts fetching mail, and
running some somewhat demanding stuff like spamasassin, the only way you
notice it is by the drop in fps, smoothness is 100% intact with SD
(ofcourse if you started HUGE load it probably would get so little cpu
it would stutter), but with every other scheduler you will notice
immediate and quite severe stuttering, in fact to many it will seem
intolerable.
I can tell you how I first noticed this, i was experimenting in ut2k4
with sd, and usually i always have to close my mail client, because when
spamasassin starts (nice 0), the game would stutter quite much, but when
i was playing i noticed some IO activity and work noises from my disk,
but that was all, no noticable stutter or problems with the 3d, but i
couldnt figure out why, i then discovered i had forgotten to close my
mail client which i previously ALWAYS have had to do.
If you have some ideas on how these problems might be fixed i'd surely
try fixes and stuff, or if you have some data you need me to collect to
better understand whats going on. But i suspect any somewhat demanding
3d application will do, and the difference is so staggering that when
you see it in effect, you cant miss it.
>
> Ingo
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-29 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-25 21:47 [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6 Ingo Molnar
2007-04-26 2:14 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-26 3:29 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-26 3:49 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-26 4:16 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-26 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-26 9:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-26 14:06 ` Redeeman
2007-04-26 14:41 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-26 20:09 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-04-26 21:21 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-27 4:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 6:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 11:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-27 11:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-27 13:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-27 13:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-27 13:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-28 15:35 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-04-28 20:45 ` Lee Revell
2007-04-29 1:18 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-04-29 5:30 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-04-29 6:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-29 6:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-29 7:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-04-29 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-29 7:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-04-29 8:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-29 8:02 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-04-29 9:52 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-29 10:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-29 7:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-29 8:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-29 8:16 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-29 8:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-04-29 8:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-29 8:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-29 10:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-29 10:33 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-29 10:48 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-04-29 11:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-29 10:53 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-29 11:11 ` Bill Huey
2007-04-29 11:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-29 11:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-04-29 11:46 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-29 12:09 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2007-04-29 15:39 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-29 11:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-29 12:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-04-29 12:00 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-04-29 12:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-29 12:21 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-04-29 12:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-29 13:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-01 7:55 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-01 13:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-29 20:30 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-29 15:28 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-29 7:59 ` Kasper Sandberg [this message]
2007-04-29 8:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-29 15:42 ` Ray Lee
2007-04-29 17:09 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-04-29 6:47 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20070429170908.GA31417@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20070429173902.GA4349@elte.hu>
2007-04-30 17:45 ` 3d smoothness (was: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6) Kasper Sandberg
2007-04-30 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-30 20:44 ` Kasper Sandberg
2007-04-27 12:52 ` [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6 William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-27 13:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-27 21:16 ` Lee Revell
2007-04-26 22:48 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-27 0:39 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-27 0:57 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-27 1:03 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-27 20:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-26 16:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-26 19:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-26 19:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-26 19:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-26 20:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-27 13:19 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-27 13:22 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-27 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-28 12:45 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-28 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-28 15:23 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-28 15:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-28 15:28 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-27 21:59 Art Haas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1177833575.9756.22.camel@localhost \
--to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=buddabrod@gmail.com \
--cc=caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@zachcarter.com \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox