From: ian <spyro@f2s.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-arm@fluff.org>
Cc: Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@gmail.com>,
kernel-discuss@handhelds.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:33:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178015607.12995.9.camel@wirenth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070501083900.GL5875@trinity.fluff.org>
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 09:39 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
>
> Wow, platform devices with a new name. I don't see how any of this is
> not handled by platfrom device.
No, not so. That was a criticism levelled at a previous incarnation of
this code which has since been addressed - this is now a convienience
layer on top of platform device, as opposed to what it used to be - a
complete device class of its own.
It eliminates a _lot_ of code duplication for hh.org, where we have
multiple machines with multiple CPU types all sharing multiple SoC chips
which have varying subsets of decices in them (eg. the TMIO SoCs share
MMC blocks with the ASIC3 ones, w1 is shared in a few devices, etc.)
> Anything registering new IRQs could create sub platform devices
> with the correct resources.
Which is exactly what this code does, but without requiring each and
every platform to rewrite the same glue code over and over.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-01 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-01 5:08 [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 8:39 ` Ben Dooks
2007-05-01 10:11 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 10:33 ` ian [this message]
2007-05-01 13:53 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-05-01 14:36 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 15:01 ` Richard Purdie
2007-05-01 17:18 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 18:58 ` Richard Purdie
2007-05-01 19:27 ` Russell King
2007-05-01 16:29 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-05-01 18:08 ` [Kernel-discuss] " ian
2007-05-01 19:08 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-05-01 20:09 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 21:17 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-05-02 13:39 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 15:55 ` ian
2007-05-01 16:38 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-05-01 17:12 ` Paul Sokolovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1178015607.12995.9.camel@wirenth \
--to=spyro@f2s.com \
--cc=ben-linux-arm@fluff.org \
--cc=kernel-discuss@handhelds.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmiscml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox