From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755356AbXEDOhw (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 10:37:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755362AbXEDOhw (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 10:37:52 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:39550 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755359AbXEDOhv (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 10:37:51 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "[PATCH] paravirt: Add startup infrastructure for paravirtualization" From: Rusty Russell To: "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Morton Cc: Andi Kleen , Chris Wright , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Zachary Amsden , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1178280770.23670.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 00:37:30 +1000 Message-Id: <1178289450.23670.100.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:13 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > We don't have any working code, there are no in tree users. Hi Eric, Lack of in-tree code is definitely not due to me. The code which uses it has been sitting in -mm for three months. Suddenly ripping this out and breaking all that work without replacing it is rude. > Therefore the code should go. Then put the patch is -mm, behind lguest. Or better, help me refine my patches and I'll happily do it for you. Of course, I expect that Andrew is about to push my patches to Linus.... any day now... right Andrew? Then we don't need this argument. Rusty.