Re: [PATCH] Introduce boot based time

Ingo Oeser
2007-05-10T22:21:37Z

Hi John and Tomas,

On Thursday 10 May 2007, john stultz wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow this.
>
> total_sleep_time stores seconds. So on 32bit systems that's 130some
> years, so it shouldn't be an issue.
>
> Is the reason you want it to be a ktime is because you want a way to
> keep sub-second sleep granularity?

No, I'm just overworked and getting sloppy :-/

Sorry for the noise...

Best regards

Ingo Oeser