From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
caglar@pardus.org.tr, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>, Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
buddabrod <buddabrod@gmail.com>, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v9
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 12:35:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178534123.25291.10.camel@Homer.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d47a5d10705070302k3f081074k89f0122cee7ae2e@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 03:02 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
> mind. I can't help
> wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is,
> why don't you
> just send your patches to Con who got this whole ball rolling and did a bunch of
> great work, proving beyond any reasonable doubt that he is capable of
> maintaining
> this subsystem, whatever algorithm is finally adopted? Are you worried that Con
> might steal your thunder? That somehow the scheduler is yours alone? That you
> might be perceived as less of a genius if somebody else gets credit
> for their good
> work? NIH?
>
> My perception is that you barged in to take over just when Con got things moving
> after the scheduler sat and rotted for several years. If that is in
> any way accurate,
> then shame on you.
Nice flame bait. There's a hell of a lot I could say about this, but
I'll just leave it.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-07 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-03 14:09 [patch] CFS scheduler, -v9 Ingo Molnar
2007-05-07 9:19 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2007-05-07 10:02 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-05-07 10:35 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2007-05-07 13:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-05-07 14:03 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-07 18:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-08 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1178534123.25291.10.camel@Homer.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=buddabrod@gmail.com \
--cc=caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=phillips@google.com \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox