From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: vgoyal@in.ibm.com, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@cmu.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:14:34 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1180944874.27018.2.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706041005.42092.rjw@sisk.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1927 bytes --]
Hi again.
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 10:05 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 4 June 2007 07:22, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I can see that the idea of writing a kernel image from using another
> > kernel sounds nice and clean initially, but the more we get into the
> > details (yes, I am listening, even though I said nothing before now),
> > the more it's sounding like the cure is worse than the disease.
> >
> > To get rid of process freezing, we're talking about:
> > * making hibernation depend on depriving the user of 32 or 64M of
> > otherwise perfectly usable memory (thereby making hibernation on
> > machines with less memory impossible)
> > * requiring them to set up kexec or kdump (I don't understand the
> > difference, sorry) or some new variation
> > * adding interfaces to tell kexec/dump/whatever what pages need to be
> > saved and reloaded
> > * adding convolutions in which at resume time we boot one kernel, switch
> > to another kernel to do the loading and then switch back again to the
> > resumed kernel (assuming I understand what you're suggesting).
> >
> > It all sounds terribly complicated and confusing to me, and that's
> > before I even begin to think about how this second kernel could possibly
> > write the image to an encrypted device or LVM or such like that the
> > first kernel knows about and might use now.
> >
> > Can't we just get the freezer right and be done with it?
>
> My feelings about this are pretty much the same. :-)
>
> At least, there still is room for improvements within the current approach,
> so first I'd like to improve it as much as reasonably possible and then to
> think of alternatives, if need be.
Agreed. I'm not for a moment denying that the current freezer could be
better, but biffing it out the window just doesn't seem to be the
appropriate solution at the moment.
Regards,
Nigel
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-04 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-01 20:39 A kexec approach to hibernation Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-06-01 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-01 22:25 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-06-01 23:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-01 23:54 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-06-02 0:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-02 1:54 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-06-02 9:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-04 10:46 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-04 12:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-06-04 13:10 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-04 13:16 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-06-11 2:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-11 22:44 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-06-04 22:09 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-06-04 22:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-06-05 8:15 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-06-05 9:34 ` Stefan Seyfried
2007-06-05 9:40 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-06-04 22:51 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-11 15:07 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-06-11 3:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-06-11 15:01 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-06-11 15:45 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-06-11 15:51 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-06-11 16:03 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-06-11 17:05 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-06-04 4:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-06-04 5:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-06-04 8:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-04 8:14 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2007-06-04 21:44 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1180944874.27018.2.camel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--to=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=jbms@cmu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox