From: Celso <celsopr@gmail.com>
To: Miguel Figueiredo <elmig@debianpt.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -ck patch | Feedback
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:52:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1181494360.4026.10.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <466A7321.4060304@debianpt.org>
Sáb, 2007-06-09 às 10:30 +0100, Miguel Figueiredo escreveu:
> Celso wrote:
> > Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the
> > kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and the response of the
> > system was better. Since that I always compile my kernels with -ck.
> > Actually I use 2.6.20-ck1 and I have no problems, even with things that
> > needs kernel-sources like gspca for my webcam.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the patches.
> >
> > PS: when will this go into the official kernel?
> >
>
> Hi there,
>
> have you tryied a newer kernel with -ck2 [1] ?
>
> I am also using a -ck patch, 2.6.21-ck2, mostly on 2 machines where i
> use as desktop and also play games. With -ck2 the experience seems less
> slugish and more smooth while playing 'second life' and have a bunch of
> other programs open (mail, a zillion web pages, irc client, feed reader,
> consoles, ...).
> The desktop seems more confortable to use than with the vanilla kernel.
> I also tryed cfs, it's also much better than the vanilla kernel but i
> still prefer -ck2 for playing second life as it feels more responsive.
>
>
> If you try the -ck2 or SD 1.0 please report your experience. It's nice
> to hear that people are testing/using these improvements on desktop usage.
>
>
>
> 1 - ck2 patch to add to vanilla 2.6.21,
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patch-2.6.21-ck2.bz2
>
> PS: I remember i read somewhere that the SD patch (included in -ck) has
> became stable (version 1.0) with a few small improvements!
>
Well, I upgrade to 2.6.21-ck2 and install it on my two pcs (I had before
2.6.20-ck1 on both) and the installation work, like always, fine. No
problems. On the pc I use most (the better one :) ) I didn't feel much
difference from 2.6.20-ck1 to 2.6.21-ck2 (for regular Desktop use), but
in the older pc, where my brother works, he says that was even more
"fluid"*.
* direct translation sorry if it doesn't sound well
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-10 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-08 22:17 -ck patch | Feedback Celso
2007-06-09 9:30 ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-06-10 16:52 ` Celso [this message]
2007-06-10 22:10 ` 2.6.22-rc4-ck1 - " Miguel Figueiredo
2007-06-11 22:17 ` Miguel Pais
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1181494360.4026.10.camel@localhost \
--to=celsopr@gmail.com \
--cc=elmig@debianpt.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox