From: Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>
To: dean gaudet <dean@arctic.org>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, clameter@sgi.com
Subject: [shm][hugetlb] Fix get_policy for stacked shared memory files
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:34:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1181597696.22671.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706092106220.10324@twinlark.arctic.org>
Here's another breakage as a result of shared memory stacked files :(
The NUMA policy for a VMA is determined by checking the following (in the order
given):
1) vma->vm_ops->get_policy() (if defined)
2) vma->vm_policy (if defined)
3) task->mempolicy (if defined)
4) Fall back to default_policy
By switching to stacked files for shared memory, get_policy() is now always set
to shm_get_policy which is a wrapper function. This causes us to stop at step
1, which yields NULL for hugetlb instead of task->mempolicy which was the
previous (and correct) result.
This patch modifies the shm_get_policy() wrapper to maintain steps 1-3 for the
wrapped vm_ops. Andi and Christoph, does this look right to you?
Signed-off-by: Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>
diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
index 4fefbad..8d2672d 100644
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -254,8 +254,10 @@ struct mempolicy *shm_get_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
if (sfd->vm_ops->get_policy)
pol = sfd->vm_ops->get_policy(vma, addr);
- else
+ else if (vma->vm_policy)
pol = vma->vm_policy;
+ else
+ pol = current->mempolicy;
return pol;
}
#endif
--
Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-11 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-16 5:41 2.6.21 numa policy and huge pages not working dean gaudet
2007-05-16 6:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-06-09 18:06 ` dean gaudet
2007-06-10 4:10 ` dean gaudet
2007-06-10 4:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-06-11 16:23 ` Adam Litke
2007-06-11 21:34 ` Adam Litke [this message]
2007-06-12 3:36 ` [shm][hugetlb] Fix get_policy for stacked shared memory files dean gaudet
2007-06-12 3:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-06-12 4:30 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-12 4:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-06-12 10:20 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-12 6:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-12 6:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-06-12 14:32 ` Adam Litke
2007-06-12 18:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1181597696.22671.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dean@arctic.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox