From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vernon Mauery <vernux@us.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: [-RT] multiple streams have degraded performance
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:51:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1182235898.7348.361.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706182212.22633.vernux@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:12 -0700, Vernon Mauery wrote:
> In looking at the performance characteristics of my network I found that
> 2.6.21.5-rt15 suffers from degraded thoughput with multiple threads. The
> test that I did this with is simply invoking 1, 2, 4, and 8 instances of
> netperf at a time and measuring the total throughput. I have two 4-way
> machines connected with 10GbE cards. I tested several kernels (some older
> and some newer) and found that the only thing in common was that with -RT
> kernels the performance went down with concurrent streams.
>
> While the test was showing the numbers for receiving as well as sending, the
> receiving numbers are not reliable because that machine was running a -RT
> kernel for these tests.
>
> I was just wondering if anyone had seen this problem before or would have any
> idea on where to start hunting for the solution.
could you enable CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
echo 0 > /proc/lock_stat
<run your test>
and report the output of (preferably not 80 column wrapped):
grep : /proc/lock_stat | head
or otherwise if there are any highly contended network locks listed?
- Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-19 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-19 5:12 [-RT] multiple streams have degraded performance Vernon Mauery
2007-06-19 6:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-06-19 14:25 ` Vernon Mauery
2007-06-19 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-06-19 17:19 ` Vernon Mauery
2007-06-20 3:38 ` Vernon Mauery
2007-06-20 7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1182235898.7348.361.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=vernux@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox