Re: [PATCH v13 1/3] x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest attestation interface driver

[Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>]

On 9/14/22 4:36 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 9/9/22 12:27, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>>
>>  arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c         | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/tdx.h |  56 ++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/tdx.h
> 
> The SEV equivalent of this in in:
> 
> 	drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c
> 
> right?
> 
> Why did you choose a different location?  Also, can you please study the

When we initially submitted the attestation patches, virt/coco folder
was not created. I initially kept this driver in platform/x86/, but
later moved to arch/x86/coco based on the review comments in v4. There
was a discussion about the need for a new config and the location of
the driver. The outcome of that discussion is, since this is not a
traditional driver, but a basic TDX feature, we don't need a special
config and the code can be maintained in the arch/x86/coco folder.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YmEfgn7fMcZ2oCnr@zn.tnic/

> SEV implementation a bit?  It might help you find problems like the
> ioctl() return code issue.  The SEV driver appears to have gotten that
> right.

Ok.

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer