From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zippel@linux-m68k.org
Subject: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:26:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11830.1013700380@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
Hi Linus,
This patch moves task_struct allocation from kernel/fork.c into
arch/*/kernel/process.c.
David Mosberger wrote:
> David.H> What might be worth doing is to move the task_struct slab
> David.H> cache and (de-)allocator out of fork.c and to stick it in
> David.H> the arch somewhere. Then archs aren't bound to have the two
> David.H> separate. So for a system that can handle lots of memory,
> David.H> you can allocate the thread_info, task_struct and
> David.H> supervisor stack all on one very large chunk if you so
> David.H> wish.
>
> Could you do this? I'd prefer if task_info could be completely hidden
> inside the x86/sparc arch-specific code, but if things are set up such
> that we at least have the option to keep the stack, task_info, and
> task_struct in a single chunk of memory (and without pointers between
> them), I'd have much less of an issue with it.
David
diff -uNr linux-2.5.5-pre1/arch/i386/kernel/process.c linux-tib-255p1/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
--- linux-2.5.5-pre1/arch/i386/kernel/process.c Thu Feb 14 14:31:13 2002
+++ linux-tib-255p1/arch/i386/kernel/process.c Thu Feb 14 14:32:35 2002
@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@
int hlt_counter;
+static kmem_cache_t *task_struct_cachep;
+
/*
* Return saved PC of a blocked thread.
*/
@@ -522,8 +524,49 @@
}
/*
- * Free current thread data structures etc..
+ * allocate and free task and thread data structures etc..
*/
+void __init init_task_struct_cache(void)
+{
+ /* create a slab on which task_structs can be allocated */
+ task_struct_cachep =
+ kmem_cache_create("task_struct",
+ sizeof(struct task_struct),0,
+ SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL, NULL);
+ if (!task_struct_cachep)
+ panic("fork_init(): cannot create task_struct SLAB cache");
+
+}
+
+struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig)
+{
+ struct task_struct *tsk;
+ struct thread_info *ti;
+
+ ti = alloc_thread_info();
+ if (!ti) return NULL;
+
+ tsk = kmem_cache_alloc(task_struct_cachep,GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!tsk) {
+ free_thread_info(ti);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ *ti = *orig->thread_info;
+ *tsk = *orig;
+ tsk->thread_info = ti;
+ ti->task = tsk;
+ atomic_set(&tsk->usage,1);
+
+ return tsk;
+}
+
+void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ free_thread_info(tsk->thread_info);
+ kmem_cache_free(task_struct_cachep,tsk);
+}
+
void exit_thread(void)
{
/* nothing to do ... */
diff -uNr linux-2.5.5-pre1/arch/sparc64/kernel/process.c linux-tib-255p1/arch/sparc64/kernel/process.c
--- linux-2.5.5-pre1/arch/sparc64/kernel/process.c Thu Feb 14 14:04:42 2002
+++ linux-tib-255p1/arch/sparc64/kernel/process.c Thu Feb 14 14:21:26 2002
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
#include <asm/elf.h>
#include <asm/fpumacro.h>
+static kmem_cache_t *task_struct_cachep;
+
/* #define VERBOSE_SHOWREGS */
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -398,7 +400,50 @@
return ret;
}
-/* Free current thread data structures etc.. */
+/*
+ * allocate and free task and thread data structures etc..
+ */
+void __init init_task_struct_cache(void)
+{
+ /* create a slab on which task_structs can be allocated */
+ task_struct_cachep =
+ kmem_cache_create("task_struct",
+ sizeof(struct task_struct),0,
+ SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL, NULL);
+ if (!task_struct_cachep)
+ panic("fork_init(): cannot create task_struct SLAB cache");
+
+}
+
+struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig)
+{
+ struct task_struct *tsk;
+ struct thread_info *ti;
+
+ ti = alloc_thread_info();
+ if (!ti) return NULL;
+
+ tsk = kmem_cache_alloc(task_struct_cachep,GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!tsk) {
+ free_thread_info(ti);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ *ti = *orig->thread_info;
+ *tsk = *orig;
+ tsk->thread_info = ti;
+ ti->task = tsk;
+ atomic_set(&tsk->usage,1);
+
+ return tsk;
+}
+
+void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ free_thread_info(tsk->thread_info);
+ kmem_cache_free(task_struct_cachep,tsk);
+}
+
void exit_thread(void)
{
struct thread_info *t = current_thread_info();
diff -uNr linux-2.5.5-pre1/include/asm-i386/processor.h linux-tib-255p1/include/asm-i386/processor.h
--- linux-2.5.5-pre1/include/asm-i386/processor.h Thu Feb 14 14:31:18 2002
+++ linux-tib-255p1/include/asm-i386/processor.h Thu Feb 14 14:38:55 2002
@@ -425,6 +425,11 @@
struct task_struct;
struct mm_struct;
+/* task structure allocation */
+extern void init_task_struct_cache(void);
+extern struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig);
+extern void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
+
/* Free all resources held by a thread. */
extern void release_thread(struct task_struct *);
/*
diff -uNr linux-2.5.5-pre1/include/asm-sparc64/processor.h linux-tib-255p1/include/asm-sparc64/processor.h
--- linux-2.5.5-pre1/include/asm-sparc64/processor.h Thu Feb 14 14:03:47 2002
+++ linux-tib-255p1/include/asm-sparc64/processor.h Thu Feb 14 14:34:38 2002
@@ -175,6 +175,11 @@
#define copy_segments(tsk, mm) do { } while (0)
#define release_segments(mm) do { } while (0)
+/* task structure allocation */
+extern void init_task_struct_cache(void);
+extern struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig);
+extern void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
+
#define get_wchan(__TSK) \
({ extern void scheduling_functions_start_here(void); \
extern void scheduling_functions_end_here(void); \
diff -uNr linux-2.5.5-pre1/kernel/fork.c linux-tib-255p1/kernel/fork.c
--- linux-2.5.5-pre1/kernel/fork.c Thu Feb 14 14:31:19 2002
+++ linux-tib-255p1/kernel/fork.c Thu Feb 14 14:32:40 2002
@@ -30,8 +30,6 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
-static kmem_cache_t *task_struct_cachep;
-
/* The idle threads do not count.. */
int nr_threads;
@@ -74,13 +72,7 @@
void __init fork_init(unsigned long mempages)
{
- /* create a slab on which task_structs can be allocated */
- task_struct_cachep =
- kmem_cache_create("task_struct",
- sizeof(struct task_struct),0,
- SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL, NULL);
- if (!task_struct_cachep)
- panic("fork_init(): cannot create task_struct SLAB cache");
+ init_task_struct_cache();
/*
* The default maximum number of threads is set to a safe
@@ -93,35 +85,6 @@
init_task.rlim[RLIMIT_NPROC].rlim_max = max_threads/2;
}
-struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig)
-{
- struct task_struct *tsk;
- struct thread_info *ti;
-
- ti = alloc_thread_info();
- if (!ti) return NULL;
-
- tsk = kmem_cache_alloc(task_struct_cachep,GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!tsk) {
- free_thread_info(ti);
- return NULL;
- }
-
- *ti = *orig->thread_info;
- *tsk = *orig;
- tsk->thread_info = ti;
- ti->task = tsk;
- atomic_set(&tsk->usage,1);
-
- return tsk;
-}
-
-void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- free_thread_info(tsk->thread_info);
- kmem_cache_free(task_struct_cachep,tsk);
-}
-
/* Protects next_safe and last_pid. */
spinlock_t lastpid_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-14 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-14 15:26 David Howells [this message]
2002-02-14 16:13 ` [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch Jeff Garzik
2002-02-14 16:32 ` David Howells
2002-02-14 16:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-14 17:03 ` David Howells
2002-02-14 20:48 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-14 23:53 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-15 9:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-15 10:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-15 11:25 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 11:37 ` David Howells
2002-02-15 12:20 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 12:56 ` David Howells
2002-02-15 13:49 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 13:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-15 14:22 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 14:07 ` David Howells
2002-02-15 14:28 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 21:56 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-15 21:52 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11830.1013700380@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox