From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761184AbXGJQgb (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:36:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756152AbXGJQgY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:36:24 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:52738 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755376AbXGJQgX (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:36:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version From: David Woodhouse To: Rodolfo Giometti Cc: Lennart Sorensen , Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20070710163625.GH32503@enneenne.com> References: <20070628161450.GD13886@enneenne.com> <1183117082.1170.308.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070629150813.GM13886@enneenne.com> <1183132548.1170.360.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070629163422.GP13886@enneenne.com> <1183135253.17622.5.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070630171340.GT13886@enneenne.com> <20070701171325.29d8b184.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070701192441.GW13886@enneenne.com> <20070710160151.GB31195@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20070710163625.GH32503@enneenne.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:36:16 +0100 Message-Id: <1184085376.32628.18.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 (2.10.2-2.fc7.dwmw2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 18:36 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > Sorry I wrote wrong. I meant __u32. We guessed that much. > I can use __u64 for seconds but doing this there could be problems for > 32 bits platforms? =:-o Why would there be problems? -- dwmw2