From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935138AbXGLRMR (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:12:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754167AbXGLRME (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:12:04 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:62300 "EHLO gateway-1237.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753071AbXGLRMB (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:12:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [announce] split-up -rt patch-queue, v2.6.22.1-rt2 From: Daniel Walker To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1184259689.12353.236.camel@chaos> References: <20070712153717.GA7442@elte.hu> <1184257998.7974.44.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> <1184259689.12353.236.camel@chaos> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:02:42 -0700 Message-Id: <1184259762.7974.51.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 (2.10.2-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 19:01 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > We know very well and Ingo nowhere said, that this is not a perfect > queue, but it was and still is _our_ work base and we opened it up for > the reasons explained. Easy Thomas .. I was just trying to be helpful .. > What we definitely not need is platitude advise, how we should manage > the queue and what could be improved as well as hysteric shuffling in > the queue right now. > > There are enough problems to work on, cleanups to do and the least one > is to worry about how the queue is organized. If you don't think massaging the queue is important right now, what are your priorities ? Daniel