From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751669AbcCDLWg (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:22:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41743 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750789AbcCDLWd (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:22:33 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1456920627.2780.60.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1456920627.2780.60.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160229182136.27797.75917.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Mimi Zohar Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] KEYS: Adjust public key signature handling MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <11844.1457090551.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 11:22:31 +0000 Message-ID: <11845.1457090551@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mimi Zohar wrote: > These patches don't apply directly on top of linux-security. Maybe > they apply on top of an updated version of the "X.509: Software public > key subtype changes" patch set. In which branch are these patches? I've rebased my keys-sig branch on top of today's security/next and fixed the patch description for the last patch to have a subject line. David