From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964853AbXGQUzJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:55:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757606AbXGQUys (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:54:48 -0400 Received: from nspiron-1.llnl.gov ([128.115.41.81]:18796 "EHLO smtp.llnl.gov" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936278AbXGQUyr (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:54:47 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 717 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:54:47 EDT X-Attachments: X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,547,1175497200"; d="scan'208"; a="30761308:sNHT2191777690" Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Further 2.6.23 merge plans... From: Matt Leininger Reply-To: leininger2@llnl.gov To: Roland Dreier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:43:07 -0700 Message-Id: <1184704987.7702.106.camel@hyperion> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 11:07 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > - Take a look at Sean's local SA caching patches. I merged > > everything else from Sean's tree, but I'm still undecided about > > these. I haven't read them carefully yet, but even aside from that > > I don't have a good feeling about whether there's consensus about > > this yet. Any opinions about merging, for or against, would be > > appreciated here. > > Does anyone other than Sean have an opinion here? If you want this > feature, if you've tested it, if you don't think it's ready yet, > whatever, please speak up -- I don't feel comfortable making a > decision on my own here (although I will if I have to). Roland, I would like to see these features moved upstream. DOE funded this work as part of the items we see needing on our large scale IB deployment (both present and future). So from at least one big customer perspective we see this as useful. I'll let others comment on specific code/implementation issues. Thanks, - Matt > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.openfabrics.org > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general -- Matt Leininger, Ph.D. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory leininger2@llnl.gov V 925-422-4110