From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Possible clocksource wrapping issues w/ new vdso clock_gettime() code?
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:04:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185213895.8850.15.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185213583.8850.12.camel@localhost>
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 10:59 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> Hey Andi,
> I've not been able to review the new vdso code very carefully yet, but
> I noticed one thing right off: the offset calculation is not masked, so
> its possible w/ counters less then 64bits wide to have wrapping issues.
Here's another minor cleanup. Looks like wall_time_nsec is being set
twice.
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c
index 06c3494..fc62608 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c
@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timespec *wall_time, struct clocksource *clock)
vsyscall_gtod_data.wall_time_sec = wall_time->tv_sec;
vsyscall_gtod_data.wall_time_nsec = wall_time->tv_nsec;
vsyscall_gtod_data.sys_tz = sys_tz;
- vsyscall_gtod_data.wall_time_nsec = wall_time->tv_nsec;
vsyscall_gtod_data.wall_to_monotonic = wall_to_monotonic;
write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&vsyscall_gtod_data.lock, flags);
}
Also, is there a reason why with the new __vdso_gettimeofday
implementation, the old do_vgettimeofday has not been removed?
thanks
-john
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-23 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-23 17:59 Possible clocksource wrapping issues w/ new vdso clock_gettime() code? john stultz
2007-07-23 18:04 ` john stultz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1185213895.8850.15.camel@localhost \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox