public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Possible clocksource wrapping issues w/ new vdso clock_gettime() code?
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:04:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185213895.8850.15.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185213583.8850.12.camel@localhost>

On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 10:59 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> Hey Andi,
> 	I've not been able to review the new vdso code very carefully yet, but
> I noticed one thing right off: the offset calculation is not masked, so
> its possible w/ counters less then 64bits wide to have wrapping issues.

Here's another minor cleanup. Looks like wall_time_nsec is being set
twice.

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c
index 06c3494..fc62608 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c
@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timespec *wall_time, struct clocksource *clock)
 	vsyscall_gtod_data.wall_time_sec = wall_time->tv_sec;
 	vsyscall_gtod_data.wall_time_nsec = wall_time->tv_nsec;
 	vsyscall_gtod_data.sys_tz = sys_tz;
-	vsyscall_gtod_data.wall_time_nsec = wall_time->tv_nsec;
 	vsyscall_gtod_data.wall_to_monotonic = wall_to_monotonic;
 	write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&vsyscall_gtod_data.lock, flags);
 }


Also, is there a reason why with the new __vdso_gettimeofday
implementation, the old do_vgettimeofday has not been removed?

thanks
-john



      reply	other threads:[~2007-07-23 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-23 17:59 Possible clocksource wrapping issues w/ new vdso clock_gettime() code? john stultz
2007-07-23 18:04 ` john stultz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1185213895.8850.15.camel@localhost \
    --to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox