From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756580AbXGaGff (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:35:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751396AbXGaGf1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:35:27 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:21944 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751342AbXGaGf0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:35:26 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.19,201,1183359600"; d="scan'208";a="256747911" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3: EFI framebuffer driver From: "Huang, Ying" To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: ak@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Yinghai Lu , Randy Dunlap , Chandramouli Narayanan , linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Antonino A. Daplas" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1185851582.23149.29.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:35:08 +0800 Message-Id: <1185863708.23149.46.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2007 06:35:19.0172 (UTC) FILETIME=[F693AC40:01C7D33C] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 22:34 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Huang, Ying" writes: > > > This patch adds Graphics Output Protocol support to the kernel. > > UEFI2.0 spec deprecates Universal Graphics Adapter (UGA) protocol and > > only Graphics Output Protocol (GOP) is produced. Therefore, the boot > > loader needs to query the UEFI firmware with appropriate Output > > Protocol and pass the video information to the kernel. As a result of > > GOP protocol, an EFI framebuffer driver is needed for displaying > > console messages. The patch adds a EFI framebuffer driver. The EFI > > frame buffer driver in this patch is based on the Intel Mac > > framebuffer driver. > > > > The ELILO bootloader takes care of passing the video information as > > appropriate for EFI firmware. > > Am I correct in understanding that you are not using any of the efi > runtime service infrastructure you have built up in other patches? Yes. The EFI runtime service is not needed for this patch. Best Regards, Huang Ying