public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: ak@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3: EFI document
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:58:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185865087.23149.50.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1r6mptcc8.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 22:40 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > This patch adds document for EFI x86_64 support. The boot parameters
> > added are documented in Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt. The setup
> > and operation guide of EFI based system is documented in
> > Documentation/x86_64/uefi.txt.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> >  i386/zero-page.txt |   18 ++++++++++++++----
> >  x86_64/uefi.txt    |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.23-rc1/Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.23-rc1.orig/Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt 2007-07-30
> > 11:28:45.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-2.6.23-rc1/Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt 2007-07-30
> > 11:29:28.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -31,11 +31,11 @@
> >   0xb0 - 0x13f		Free. Add more parameters here if you really need them.
> >   0x140- 0x1be		EDID_INFO Video mode setup
> >  
> > -0x1c4	unsigned long	EFI system table pointer
> > -0x1c8	unsigned long	EFI memory descriptor size
> > -0x1cc	unsigned long	EFI memory descriptor version
> > +0x1c4	unsigned long	EFI system table pointer*
> > +0x1c8	unsigned long	EFI memory descriptor size*
> > +0x1cc	unsigned long	EFI memory descriptor version*
> >  0x1d0	unsigned long	EFI memory descriptor map pointer
> > -0x1d4	unsigned long	EFI memory descriptor map size
> > +0x1d4	unsigned long	EFI memory descriptor map size*
> >  0x1e0	unsigned long	ALT_MEM_K, alternative mem check, in Kb
> >  0x1e4	unsigned long	Scratch field for the kernel setup code
> >  0x1e8	char		number of entries in E820MAP (below)
> > @@ -87,3 +87,13 @@
> >  0x2d0 - 0xd00		E820MAP
> >  0xd00 - 0xeff		EDDBUF (edd.S) for disk signature read sector
> >  0xd00 - 0xeeb		EDDBUF (edd.S) for edd data
> > +
> > +Changes for x86_64 implementation:
> > +---------------------------------
> > +For alignment purposes, the following parameters are rearranged.
> > +
> > +0x1b8	unsigned long	EFI system table pointer
> > +0x1c0	unsigned long	EFI Loader signature
> > +0x1c4	unsigned long	EFI memory descriptor size
> > +0x1c8	unsigned long	EFI memory descriptor version
> > +0x1cc	unsigned long	EFI memory descriptor map size
> 
> Huh?  It is the same protocol.  Unless there are specific issues such
> as pointers being to small we should remain 100% the same for both
> arch/i386 and arch/x86_64   This variation looks like a serious
> bug.

The parameters are rearranged, because the pointer is too small. For
example, the EFI system table pointer is 8 bytes in x86_64, while it is
4 bytes in i386.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-31  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-31  3:13 [PATCH 5/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3: EFI document Huang, Ying
2007-07-31  4:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-07-31  6:58   ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2007-08-01 17:16     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-07  9:29       ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-07  9:54         ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08  8:18           ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-08 10:08             ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08 13:46               ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-08 14:09                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08 15:11                   ` huang ying
2007-08-08 16:23                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08 16:10               ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-08 16:22                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08 17:17                   ` Eric W. Biederman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-09  9:47 Etienne Lorrain
2007-08-09 10:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-09 14:09   ` huang ying
2007-08-09 16:29     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-09 17:01     ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-09 17:25       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-10 13:03       ` Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1185865087.23149.50.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mouli@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox