From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: yield debugging
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:53:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1186001617.19777.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070731203351.GB21667@elte.hu>
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ok, good! Could you try the updated debug patch below? I've done two
> changes: made '1' the default, and added the
> /proc/sys/kernel/sched_yield_granularity_ns tunable. (available if
> CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y)
>
> Could you try to change the yield-granularity tunable and see which
> value gives the best performance? A value of '100000' should in theory
> give the current (80% degraded) volanomark performance, the default
> value should give the above '20% down' result. The question is, is '20%
> down' the best we can get out of it? Does larger/smaller
> yield-granularity help perhaps? You can change it to any value between
> 100 usecs and 1 second.
>
Turning up the granuality helped. Here's the data I got
for Volanomark performance relative to 2.6.22
Granuality
1000000000 (max) 9% down
800000000 8% down
80000000 13% down
8000000 20% down
100000 56% down
Tim
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-01 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-27 22:01 Volanomark slows by 80% under CFS Tim Chen
2007-07-28 0:31 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-28 0:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-07-28 3:43 ` pluggable scheduler flamewar thread (was Re: Volanomark slows by 80% under CFS) Chris Snook
2007-07-28 5:01 ` pluggable scheduler " Andrea Arcangeli
2007-07-28 6:51 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-30 18:49 ` Tim Chen
2007-07-30 21:07 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-30 21:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-07-28 13:28 ` Volanomark slows by 80% under CFS Dmitry Adamushko
2007-07-28 2:47 ` Rik van Riel
2007-07-28 20:26 ` Dave Jones
2007-07-28 12:36 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-07-28 18:55 ` David Schwartz
2007-07-29 17:37 ` [patch] sched: yield debugging Ingo Molnar
2007-07-30 18:10 ` Tim Chen
2007-07-31 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01 20:53 ` Tim Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1186001617.19777.64.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox