From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1032397AbXHMRRW (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:17:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S968474AbXHMRFJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:05:09 -0400 Received: from DSL022.labridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:3187 "EHLO perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S973588AbXHMRFG (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:05:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [70/2many] MAINTAINERS - ARPD SUPPORT From: Joe Perches To: Alan Cox Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <20070813173522.685dab9e@the-village.bc.nu> References: <46bff8e8.HhTQ7TBPy1zkcNfh%joe@perches.com> <20070813114942.04a5483c@the-village.bc.nu> <1187019966.10249.75.camel@localhost> <20070813173522.685dab9e@the-village.bc.nu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:04:19 -0700 Message-Id: <1187024659.10249.125.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2-2.1mdv2007.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 17:35 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > I wouldn't add a pattern for this. Back to:ARPD SUPPORT P: Jonathan Layes L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained > Actually I think the entire thing is a > bad idea but thats another matter. Of course it's not an end-all solution, but what might work better?