From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Bob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "double" hpet clocksource && hard freeze [bisected]
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:17:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1187979454.6163.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070824124631.GF10594@localhost>
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 08:46 -0400, Bob Picco wrote:
> john stultz wrote: [Thu Aug 23 2007, 05:41:45PM EDT]
> > On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 14:05 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 13:41 -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > > > I have a double "hpet" entry in "available_clocksource":
> > > > > $ cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
> > > > > tsc hpet hpet acpi_pm jiffies
> > > >
> > > > Oops. If seems that both drivers/char/hpet.c and arch/x86_64/kernel/hpet.c
> > > > both register a clocksource named "hpet". Probably a result of bringing
> > > > back to life a long lost patch, and having someone else (John Stultz, according
> > > > to git blame) make a similar change to a different file in the intervening
> > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > Presumably the thing to do would be merge the x86_64 specific version
> > > > into the drivers/char/hpet.c version?
> > >
> > > Ugh. Yea. i386 has an hpet clocksource as well. We should kill the
> > > duplication, but at the moment I'm not comfortable that the
> > > driver/char/hpet.c is ok to be used for i386/x86_64 (Bob: Do you know
> > > why the shift value is only 10?).
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm a little surprised by this, as the clocksource code use to prevent
> > > duplicate named clocksources from being registered, so I'm not sure how
> > > that check got dropped. Also I'm not quite sure I see where the hard
> > > freeze is coming from.
> > >
> > > My initial reaction would be to either ifdef ia64 implementation in
> > > drivers/char/hpet.c or move the code under the ia64 arch dir until it is
> > > really usable by all arches.
> >
> > Here is a possible quick fix. I'm open to other approaches, but I also
> > want to avoid too much churn before 2.6.23 goes out.
> >
> > Paolo, could you verify this fixes the issue for you?
> >
> > thanks
> > -john
> >
> [snip]
>
> I saw what was missed by me in my brief examination of this last night.
> The platform registers the hpet clocksource too.
>
> Instead of adding the config flag to hpet driver, how about the patch
> below? Since you already check for duplication by address then adding
> a check for by name too seems okay to me.
>
> bob
>
>
> Prevent duplicate names being registered with clocksource. This also
> eliminates the duplication of hpet clock registration when the arch
> uses the hpet timer and the hpet driver does too. The patch was
> compile and link tested.
Yea. While I'm still not completely comfortable leaving this up to boot
order alone (the ia64 hpet clocksource is clearly causing issues on
x86_64), I think this patch is something we need as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com>
Acked-by: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.23-rc3/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc3.orig/kernel/time/clocksource.c 2007-08-23 16:44:03.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc3/kernel/time/clocksource.c 2007-08-24 08:36:41.000000000 -0400
> @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int clocksource_enqueue(struct cl
> struct clocksource *cs;
>
> cs = list_entry(tmp, struct clocksource, list);
> - if (cs == c)
> + if (cs == c || !strcmp(cs->name, c->name))
> return -EBUSY;
> /* Keep track of the place, where to insert */
> if (cs->rating >= c->rating)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-24 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-23 20:21 "double" hpet clocksource && hard freeze [bisected] Paolo Ornati
2007-08-23 20:22 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-23 20:41 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-23 21:05 ` john stultz
2007-08-23 21:38 ` Bob Picco
2007-08-24 7:03 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-23 21:41 ` john stultz
2007-08-24 7:01 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-24 12:46 ` Bob Picco
2007-08-24 13:27 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-24 16:04 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-24 16:13 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-24 18:17 ` john stultz [this message]
2007-08-27 20:34 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-08-27 21:39 ` john stultz
2007-08-28 6:07 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-24 9:03 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-24 18:43 ` john stultz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-28 8:27 Clemens Ladisch
2007-08-28 20:21 ` Paolo Ornati
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1187979454.6163.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=bob.picco@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ornati@fastwebnet.it \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox