From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756974AbXH2SqT (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:46:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751737AbXH2SqH (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:46:07 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:59888 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362AbXH2SqF (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:46:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH] Memory controller improve user interface From: Dave Hansen To: Balbir Singh Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux MM Mailing List , David Rientjes , Linux Containers , Paul Menage In-Reply-To: <20070829111030.9987.8104.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> References: <20070829111030.9987.8104.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:45:48 -0700 Message-Id: <1188413148.28903.113.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 16:40 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > > @@ -352,7 +353,7 @@ int mem_container_charge(struct page *pa > kfree(pc); > pc = race_pc; > atomic_inc(&pc->ref_cnt); > - res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, 1); > + res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, MEM_CONTAINER_CHARGE_KB); > css_put(&mem->css); > goto done; > } Do these changes really need to happen anywhere besides the user<->kernel boundary? Why can't internal tracking be in pages? -- Dave