From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756741AbXIATRw (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:17:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753923AbXIATRn (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:17:43 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:39633 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753484AbXIATRm (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:17:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6 From: Peter Zijlstra To: clameter@sgi.com Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Arcangeli In-Reply-To: <20070828190551.415127746@sgi.com> References: <20070828190551.415127746@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:17:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1188674255.6432.3.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.11.91 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 12:05 -0700, clameter@sgi.com wrote: > Todo/Issues: - reclaim by mixing large order pages into the regular lru, page aging gets rather unfair. One possible solution to this is address_space based reclaim, something which might also be beneficial for containers.