From: Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
adam@yggdrasil.com, jcm@jonmasters.org,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix (improve) deadlock condition on module removal netfilter socket option removal
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:19:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1189016363.12261.122.camel@jcmlaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1189014097.10802.174.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 03:41 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 13:08 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 02:13:26AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 17:22 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > > But I'm wondering, wouldn't module refcounting alone fix this problem?
> > > > If we make nf_sockopt() call try_module_get(ops->owner), remove_module()
> > > > on ip_tables.ko would simply fail because the refcount is above zero
> > > > (so it would fail at point 3 above). Am I missing something important?
> > >
> > > Yes, that seems the correct solution to me, too. ISTR that this code
> > > predates the current module code.
> > >
> > > Rusty.
> >
> > Thanks guys-
> > When I first started looking at this problem I would have agreed with
> > you, that module reference counting alone would fix the problem. However,
> > delete_module can work in either a non-blocking or a blocking mode. rmmod
> > passes O_NONBLOCK to delete module, and so is fine, but modprobe does not.
> You have this backwards: O_NONBLOCK is the default. That seems to be
> what everyone wants, although I implemented 'rmmod -w' because it seemed
> like a good option.
:-)
Thanks for keeping me copied. I'll think about the in-kernel module
situation when I get some time over the weekend - but shout if there's
an external impact sooner! :-)
Jon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-05 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-04 20:24 [PATCH 0/2] Fix (improve) deadlock condition on module removal netfilter socket option removal Neil Horman
2007-09-05 15:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-05 16:13 ` Rusty Russell
2007-09-05 17:08 ` Neil Horman
2007-09-05 17:41 ` Rusty Russell
2007-09-05 18:19 ` Jon Masters [this message]
2007-09-05 19:27 ` Neil Horman
2007-09-05 20:17 ` Jon Masters
2007-09-05 20:51 ` Rusty Russell
2007-09-05 20:59 ` Jon Masters
2007-09-05 21:39 ` Jon Masters
2007-09-06 0:17 ` Neil Horman
2007-09-06 12:55 ` Neil Horman
2007-09-06 13:35 ` Jon Masters
2007-09-06 15:40 ` Neil Horman
2007-09-06 10:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-06 11:08 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1189016363.12261.122.camel@jcmlaptop \
--to=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=adam@yggdrasil.com \
--cc=jcm@jonmasters.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox