From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@maven.pl>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de>, Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>
Subject: Re: [3/3] 2.6.23-rc6: known regressions v2
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:47:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1190058463.2995.14.camel@chaos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709172144.43761.arekm@maven.pl>
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 21:44 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Saturday 15 of September 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 15 September 2007 04:29, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>
> > > Subject : resume from ram much slower
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/275
> > > Last known good : 2.6.23-rc1 ?
> > > Submitter : Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@maven.pl>
> > > Caused-By : ?
> > > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > Status : problem is being debugged
> >
> > Unresolved, bisection might be helpful.
>
> Took 16 hours of bisecting and playing with stuff.
>
> It looks like the problematic patch is 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6.
> bisection was hard and I'm 95% sure that this is the problematic patch.
> I'm currently using 2.6.23-rc6 with this reverted and so far resume works as it should.
>
>
> commit 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Sat Jul 21 04:37:34 2007 -0700
>
> clockevents: fix resume logic
Linus pulled a series of patches which are addressing this issue into
his tree yesterday. Can you please retest against current git ?
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-17 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <46EB3EF8.6040103@googlemail.com>
2007-09-15 2:29 ` [3/3] 2.6.23-rc6: known regressions v2 Michal Piotrowski
2007-09-15 18:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-17 19:44 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2007-09-17 19:47 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2007-09-17 20:51 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2007-09-17 21:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-09-18 7:07 ` Soeren Sonnenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1190058463.2995.14.camel@chaos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arekm@maven.pl \
--cc=kernel@nn7.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tv@lio96.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox