From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756920AbXI2AMh (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:12:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755024AbXI2AMa (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:12:30 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]:14081 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752364AbXI2AM3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:12:29 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=RpLQE0UJf3lfklYxrPh+o0CSyuD6JkE3q6pqooViEoaXrBrtAAjUlMGU7tVm0/0gN/faDFQavO6RGasR16r09X+WaczbfSB3b4XO+vCUQJGh7oioK8b4oVUEax7fgc1EWlN0MXq+w/5OlSJ4h+aD17H2Aszrj/9IUT52gq/YbS0= Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] video gfx: merge kconfig menus From: "Antonino A. Daplas" To: Randy Dunlap Cc: lkml , airlied@linux.ie, akpm In-Reply-To: <20070924232536.b1123359.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20070924232536.b1123359.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:12:11 +0800 Message-Id: <1191024731.5273.6.camel@daplas> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 23:25 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Is there some reason that we don't put all video gfx config in one > place? Is the split just historical, based on subdirectory locations, > or is there a bigger reason for it? Just historical, based on subdirectory locations. Someone did attempt to move the drm subdirectory under the video subdirectory during the 2.5 era but it was rejected. Anyway, I'm fine with this too. Tony