From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
mark.fasheh@oracle.com, hugh <hugh@veritas.com>,
stable <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: set_page_dirty_balance() vs ->page_mkwrite()
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:54:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191862477.20745.22.camel@twins> (raw)
It seems that with the recent usage of ->page_mkwrite() a little detail
was overlooked.
.22-rc1 merged OCFS2 usage of this hook
.23-rc1 merged XFS usage
.24-rc1 will most likely merge NFS usage
Please consider this for .23 final and maybe even .22.x
---
Subject: mm: set_page_dirty_balance() vs ->page_mkwrite()
All the current page_mkwrite() implementations also set the page dirty. Which
results in the set_page_dirty_balance() call to _not_ call balance, because the
page is already found dirty.
This allows us to dirty a _lot_ of pages without ever hitting
balance_dirty_pages(). Not good (tm).
Force a balance call if ->page_mkwrite() was successful.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/writeback.h | 2 +-
mm/memory.c | 9 +++++++--
mm/page-writeback.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/writeback.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ int sync_page_range(struct inode *inode,
loff_t pos, loff_t count);
int sync_page_range_nolock(struct inode *inode, struct address_space *mapping,
loff_t pos, loff_t count);
-void set_page_dirty_balance(struct page *page);
+void set_page_dirty_balance(struct page *page, int page_mkwrite);
void writeback_set_ratelimit(void);
/* pdflush.c */
Index: linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memory.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
@@ -1559,6 +1559,7 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct mm_struct *
struct page *old_page, *new_page;
pte_t entry;
int reuse = 0, ret = 0;
+ int page_mkwrite = 0;
struct page *dirty_page = NULL;
old_page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, orig_pte);
@@ -1607,6 +1608,8 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct mm_struct *
page_cache_release(old_page);
if (!pte_same(*page_table, orig_pte))
goto unlock;
+
+ page_mkwrite = 1;
}
dirty_page = old_page;
get_page(dirty_page);
@@ -1691,7 +1694,7 @@ unlock:
* do_no_page is protected similarly.
*/
wait_on_page_locked(dirty_page);
- set_page_dirty_balance(dirty_page);
+ set_page_dirty_balance(dirty_page, page_mkwrite);
put_page(dirty_page);
}
return ret;
@@ -2238,6 +2241,7 @@ static int __do_fault(struct mm_struct *
struct page *dirty_page = NULL;
struct vm_fault vmf;
int ret;
+ int page_mkwrite = 0;
vmf.virtual_address = (void __user *)(address & PAGE_MASK);
vmf.pgoff = pgoff;
@@ -2315,6 +2319,7 @@ static int __do_fault(struct mm_struct *
anon = 1; /* no anon but release vmf.page */
goto out;
}
+ page_mkwrite = 1;
}
}
@@ -2375,7 +2380,7 @@ out_unlocked:
if (anon)
page_cache_release(vmf.page);
else if (dirty_page) {
- set_page_dirty_balance(dirty_page);
+ set_page_dirty_balance(dirty_page, page_mkwrite);
put_page(dirty_page);
}
Index: linux-2.6/mm/page-writeback.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -460,9 +460,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
pdflush_operation(background_writeout, 0);
}
-void set_page_dirty_balance(struct page *page)
+void set_page_dirty_balance(struct page *page, int page_mkwrite)
{
- if (set_page_dirty(page)) {
+ if (set_page_dirty(page) || page_mkwrite) {
struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
if (mapping)
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-08 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-08 16:54 Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-10-08 6:37 ` [PATCH] mm: set_page_dirty_balance() vs ->page_mkwrite() Nick Piggin
2007-10-08 23:36 ` David Chinner
2007-10-08 7:47 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-09 2:12 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-10-08 14:50 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191862477.20745.22.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox