From: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.23
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:12:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191996740.8694.7.camel@entropy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710091346490.5039@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 13:54 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Finally.
>
> Yeah, it got delayed, not because of any huge issues, but because of
> various bugfixes trickling in and causing me to reset my "release clock"
> all the time. But it's out there now, and hopefully better for the wait.
>
> Not a whole lot of changes since -rc9, although there's a few updates to
> mips, sparc64 and blackfin in there. Ignoring those arch updates, there's
> basically a number of mostly one-liners (mostly in drivers, but there's
> some networking fixes and soem VFS/VM fixes there too).
>
> Shortlog and diffstat appended (both relative to -rc9, of course - the
> full log from 2.6.22 is on kernel.org as usual).
>
> I want this to be what people look at for a few days, but expect the x86
> merge to go ahead after that. So far, all indications are still that it's
> going to be all smooth sailing, but hey, those indicators seem to always
> say that, and only after the fact do people notice any problems ;)
>
> Linus
Does CFS still generate the following sysbench graphs with 2.6.23, or
did that get fixed?
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/linux-pgsql.png
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/linux-mysql.png
(There's also some interesting FreeBSD vs. Linux graphs in
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/Scalability%20Update.pdf , but
AFAIK those comparisons are more indicative of glibc malloc performance
than Linux performance.)
--
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-10 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-09 20:54 Linux 2.6.23 Linus Torvalds
2007-10-10 6:12 ` Nicholas Miell [this message]
2007-10-10 10:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-11 1:20 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-10-11 2:34 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2007-10-11 13:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-11 9:16 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-12 5:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-11 14:15 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-12 12:21 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-10 7:44 ` René Rebe
2007-10-10 8:37 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-10-10 9:12 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-10-10 10:36 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-10-10 10:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-10 11:13 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-10-10 19:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-10 19:26 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-10-10 20:04 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-10 23:27 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191996740.8694.7.camel@entropy \
--to=nmiell@comcast.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox