From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v5 0/3] i386/x86_64 boot: 32-bit boot protocol
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:59:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192586376.17856.26.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1192168345.17539.42.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 13:52 +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Known Issues:
>
> - Where is safe to place the linked list of setup_data? Because the
> length of the linked list of setup_data is variable, it can not be
> copied into BSS segment of kernel as that of "zero page". We must
> find a safe place for it, where it will not be overwritten by kernel
> during booting up. The i386 kernel will overwrite some pages after
> _end. The x86_64 kernel will overwrite some pages from 0x1000 on.
Do you think it is a good idea to check the collision between setup data
and memory area used during kernel boot through bootmem allocator? If
any memory area used by setup data is reserved in bootmem allocator by
some other kernel subsystem, there is a collision, otherwise, the setup
data should be safe.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-12 5:52 [PATCH -mm -v5 0/3] i386/x86_64 boot: 32-bit boot protocol Huang, Ying
2007-10-15 1:47 ` Huang, Ying
2007-10-17 1:59 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2007-10-17 8:25 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-17 9:05 ` Huang, Ying
2007-10-17 9:24 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-18 6:44 ` Huang, Ying
2007-10-17 9:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-18 6:57 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1192586376.17856.26.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mouli@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox