Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes

Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-21T12:51:37Z

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> You always put boring, crappy, insufficient text in the for-the-changelog
> section and interesting, useful, sufficient text in the not-for-the-changelog
> section.

I'll swap the sections in the future then. ;-) Frankly I was not sure
whether the changelog was happy about being fed with lengthy explanations
and it has not spoken out.

I have to admit this is a habit carried over from the FSF-style ChangeLog
-- where the enforced rule is actually *not* to provide any explanation
for why changes are done and only describe what has been modified (with
any discussion around archived in the respective mailing list).

> But you can't fool me! I have an editor and I fix it up.

Thank you and sorry for the extra work I caused you -- I shall keep your
suggestion in mind in the future.

Maciej