From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751820AbXJUVLR (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:11:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750808AbXJUVLG (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:11:06 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:52483 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750703AbXJUVLF (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:11:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] synchronize_irq needs a barrier From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org To: Herbert Xu Cc: Linus Torvalds , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: <1192769910.7367.106.camel@pasglop> References: <1192745137.7367.40.camel@pasglop> <1192749449.7367.51.camel@pasglop> <20071019023219.GB8453@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071019042025.GA9617@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071019044806.GA10080@gondor.apana.org.au> <1192769910.7367.106.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:10:05 +1000 Message-Id: <1193001005.6745.34.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org .../... > This patch (mostly written by Linus) fixes this by using spin > > locks instead of memory barries on the synchronize_irq() path. > > > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu > > Good for me. > > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Hrm... not on yet. Herbert, care to resend, looks like it fell down the wrong hole in Linus mailbox :-) Cheers, Ben.