From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de,
mingo@elte.hu, chrisw@sous-sol.org, jeremy@goop.org,
avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, lguest@ozlabs.org,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, zach@vmware.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, jun.nakajima@intel.com, glommer@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] (Re-)introducing pvops for x86_64 - Consolidation part
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:13:12 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193857999499-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi folks,
Here is the result of the latest work on the pvops front, after the x86
arch merge. From the functionality point of view, almost nothing was
changed, except for proper vsmp support - which was discussed, but not
implemented before - and the introduction of smp_ops in x86_64, which eased
the merging of the smp header.
Speaking of the merge, a significant part (although not majority) of this
work is merging things that was not possible before, due to the lack of
paravirt for x86_64. What was done then, can be thought as a
"lookahead-merge", which is a normal code, but just taking into account that
we'll have support for paravirt_ops in x86_64 in the future. Note for that
files, there can be room left for more integration. This is just the first,
not the final step.
For this reason, I'm splitting this series in two. The first one, which will
follow this message, are really just integration patches. Besides making
review even easier, we believe that those could get into the .24 time frame,
just like all the other merge patches that are already going in.
In a separate series, you'll get the actual pvops implementation.
That said, have fun!
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-31 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-31 19:13 Glauber de Oliveira Costa [this message]
2007-10-31 19:13 ` [PATCH 1/7] irqflags consolidation Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:13 ` [PATCH 2/7] consolidate spinlock.h Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:13 ` [PATCH 3/7] tlb functions consolidation Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:13 ` [PATCH 4/7] smp x86 consolidation Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:13 ` [PATCH 5/7] Add debugreg/load_rsp native hooks Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:13 ` [PATCH 6/7] consolidate apic.h functions Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:13 ` [PATCH 7/7] consolidate msr.h Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193857999499-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com \
--to=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lguest@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox