From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony@bakeyournoodle.com,
paulus@samba.org, dino@in.ibm.com, tytso@us.ibm.com,
dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, antonb@us.ibm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 07:52:04 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1194641524.21340.14.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071109181028.GA26800@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.23.1-rt4/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c linux-2.6.23.1-rt4-fix/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> --- linux-2.6.23.1-rt4/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c 2007-10-12 09:43:44.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.23.1-rt4-fix/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c 2007-11-08 20:33:59.000000000 -0800
> @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
> struct thread_struct *new_thread, *old_thread;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct task_struct *last;
> + struct ppc64_tlb_batch *batch;
> + int hadbatch;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /* avoid complexity of lazy save/restore of fpu
> @@ -325,6 +327,16 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
> }
> #endif
>
> + batch = &get_cpu_var(ppc64_tlb_batch);
> + if (batch->active) {
> + hadbatch = 1;
> + if (batch->index) {
> + __flush_tlb_pending(batch);
> + }
> + batch->active = 0;
> + }
> + put_cpu_var(ppc64_tlb_batch);
> +
> local_irq_save(flags);
>
> account_system_vtime(current);
> @@ -335,6 +347,12 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
>
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> + if (hadbatch) {
> + batch = &get_cpu_var(ppc64_tlb_batch);
> + batch->active = 1;
> + put_cpu_var(ppc64_tlb_batch);
> + }
> +
> return last;
> }
I doubt we can schedule within __switch_to() (can somebody confirm
this ?), in which case, you can just use __get_cpu_var() and avoid
the put, thus saving a handful of cycles in the code above.
> /* export that to outside world */
> struct device_node *of_chosen;
> diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.23.1-rt4/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c linux-2.6.23.1-rt4-fix/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> --- linux-2.6.23.1-rt4/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c 2007-10-27 22:20:57.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.23.1-rt4-fix/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c 2007-10-28 13:49:07.000000000 -0700
> @@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ good_area:
> if (get_pteptr(mm, address, &ptep, &pmdp)) {
> spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmdp);
> spin_lock(ptl);
> + preempt_disable();
> if (pte_present(*ptep)) {
> struct page *page = pte_page(*ptep);
>
> @@ -310,10 +311,12 @@ good_area:
> }
> pte_update(ptep, 0, _PAGE_HWEXEC);
> _tlbie(address);
> + preempt_enable();
> pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> return 0;
> }
> + preempt_enable();
> pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
> }
> #endif
The patch above will have to be rebased following a fix I did that makes
_tlbie() takes a context ID argument. I don't actually think
preempt_disable/enable is necessary here. I don't think it matters if we
preempt here, but I suppose better safe than sorry.... (this is 44x
code).
Overall, looks fine !
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-09 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-09 18:10 [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER Paul E. McKenney
2007-11-09 20:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-11-09 22:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-11-11 3:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-11 14:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-11 20:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-12 17:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-11-12 19:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-11-12 21:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-13 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-13 9:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-13 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-13 10:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-13 11:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-10 1:18 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1194641524.21340.14.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=antonb@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tony@bakeyournoodle.com \
--cc=tytso@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox