public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony@bakeyournoodle.com,
	paulus@samba.org, dino@in.ibm.com, tytso@us.ibm.com,
	dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, antonb@us.ibm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 07:52:04 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1194641524.21340.14.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071109181028.GA26800@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.23.1-rt4/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c linux-2.6.23.1-rt4-fix/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> --- linux-2.6.23.1-rt4/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c	2007-10-12 09:43:44.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.23.1-rt4-fix/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c	2007-11-08 20:33:59.000000000 -0800
> @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
>  	struct thread_struct *new_thread, *old_thread;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct task_struct *last;
> +	struct ppc64_tlb_batch *batch;
> +	int hadbatch;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	/* avoid complexity of lazy save/restore of fpu
> @@ -325,6 +327,16 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
>  	}
>  #endif
>  
> +	batch = &get_cpu_var(ppc64_tlb_batch);
> +	if (batch->active) {
> +		hadbatch = 1;
> +		if (batch->index) {
> +			__flush_tlb_pending(batch);
> +		}
> +		batch->active = 0;
> +	}
> +	put_cpu_var(ppc64_tlb_batch);
> +
>  	local_irq_save(flags);
>  
>  	account_system_vtime(current);
> @@ -335,6 +347,12 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
>  
>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  
> +	if (hadbatch) {
> +		batch = &get_cpu_var(ppc64_tlb_batch);
> +		batch->active = 1;
> +		put_cpu_var(ppc64_tlb_batch);
> +	}
> +
>  	return last;
>  }

I doubt we can schedule within __switch_to() (can somebody confirm
this ?), in which case, you can just use __get_cpu_var() and avoid
the put, thus saving a handful of cycles in the code above.

>  /* export that to outside world */
>  struct device_node *of_chosen;
> diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.23.1-rt4/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c linux-2.6.23.1-rt4-fix/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> --- linux-2.6.23.1-rt4/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c	2007-10-27 22:20:57.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.23.1-rt4-fix/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c	2007-10-28 13:49:07.000000000 -0700
> @@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ good_area:
>  		if (get_pteptr(mm, address, &ptep, &pmdp)) {
>  			spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmdp);
>  			spin_lock(ptl);
> +			preempt_disable();
>  			if (pte_present(*ptep)) {
>  				struct page *page = pte_page(*ptep);
>  
> @@ -310,10 +311,12 @@ good_area:
>  				}
>  				pte_update(ptep, 0, _PAGE_HWEXEC);
>  				_tlbie(address);
> +				preempt_enable();
>  				pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
>  				up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>  				return 0;
>  			}
> +			preempt_enable();
>  			pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
>  		}
>  #endif

 
The patch above will have to be rebased following a fix I did that makes
_tlbie() takes a context ID argument. I don't actually think
preempt_disable/enable is necessary here. I don't think it matters if we
preempt here, but I suppose better safe than sorry.... (this is 44x
code).

Overall, looks fine !

Cheers,
Ben.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-09 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-09 18:10 [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on POWER Paul E. McKenney
2007-11-09 20:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-11-09 22:07   ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-11-11  3:59     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-11 14:45       ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-11 20:48         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-12 17:05           ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-11-12 19:15           ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-11-12 21:12             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-13  9:10               ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-13  9:43                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-13 10:05                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-13 10:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-13 11:09                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-10  1:18   ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1194641524.21340.14.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=antonb@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tony@bakeyournoodle.com \
    --cc=tytso@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox