From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758694AbYDMNGI (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:06:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755515AbYDMNF4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:05:56 -0400 Received: from smtp2web.tin.it ([212.216.176.236]:54433 "EHLO smtp2web.tin.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755319AbYDMNF4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:05:56 -0400 Message-ID: <11947e44e7e.d.capitella@tin.it> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:05:54 +0100 (GMT+01:00) From: "d.capitella@tin.it" Reply-To: "d.capitella@tin.it" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Implementing a Linux Security Module Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 90.131.250.240 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi there! I'm studying the Linux Security Module Framework, and I'm experiencing some issues while trying to register the modules I create. I created a basic test module that just registers itself as a lsm. I tried to load it on many distros, Ubuntu, Fedora, RedHat but it is not allowed to register. May this be due to other LSMs that doesn't support stacking and that are already loaded on those distros? If that's the problem, can't we just create a security module that does nothing but managing the stacking of other security modules? Thanks, Donato Capitella