From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@lifl.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
cpufreq <cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic at boot with ondemand governor as default (2.6.24-rc2)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:23:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1194880989.5474.12.camel@queen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47385D05.20705@lifl.fr>
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 15:02 +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
> 11/12/2007 10:16 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote/a écrit:
> > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 20:10 +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I've tried kernel 2.6.24-rc2 and I have a problem with the new option
> >> for setting up the cpufreq ondemand governor as default: a kernel panic
> >> happens early at boot time. If I boot first with performance governor
> >> and later change to ondemand, everything is fine (as usual).
> >>
> >> This seems related to the delayed_workqueue. The kernel panic message
> >> finishes by:
> >> EIP: [<c012aa60>] wq_per_cpu+0x0/0x10 SS:ESP 0068:c191be58
> >> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
> >>
> >> A picture of the whole message is available here:
> >> http://pieleric.free.fr/unorder/1162-ondemand-panic.jpg
> >>
> >> My computer is a x86 using speedstep-ich, and you can find the full
> >> .config leading to the panic attached.
> >>
> >> Does anyone has any idea was it going wrong?
> >
> > Does it work if you compile speedstep-ich as a module?
> > If you load it, ondemand governor should still be set up automatically.
> > If this works, could it be that the kernel does not like that
> > queue_delayed_work_on is called that early?
>
> Yes, it works if I compile speedstep-ich as module. I've put the module
> in initramfs and as soon it is loaded, the ondemand governor is selected
> and works.
>
> However, do you think it's ok to prevent cpufreq drivers to be built-in
> if ondemand governor is selected as default?
> Another way would be to
> reorganise the initialisation code so that workqueue is initialised
> before the cpufreq framework is started, do you think it's possible?
Making all this work with low-level drivers built in would be perfect of
course...
If nobody answers the next days, could you open a bug at
bugzilla.kernel.org, so that this does not get lost, pls.
Add myself and Venkatesh to CC...
I try to have a look at it ASAP.
If someone already finds out more, this would be great.
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-12 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-11 19:10 Kernel panic at boot with ondemand governor as default (2.6.24-rc2) Eric Piel
2007-11-11 22:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-12 0:38 ` Eric Piel
2007-11-12 9:16 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-11-12 14:02 ` Eric Piel
2007-11-12 15:23 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2007-11-12 20:26 ` Dave Jones
2007-11-12 23:09 ` Eric Piel
2007-11-15 23:37 ` Eric Piel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1194880989.5474.12.camel@queen.suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=Eric.Piel@lifl.fr \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox