From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anders Henke <anders.henke@1und1.de>,
Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
matthew@wil.cx, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2 check page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:54:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1197489294.4203.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071212111629.9a4f7f73.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 11:16 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:43:42 +0100 Anders Henke <anders.henke@1und1.de> wrote:
>
> > Am 12.12.2007 schrieb Miquel van Smoorenburg:
> > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 03:38 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:58:41 +0100 Anders Henke <anders.henke@1und1.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to let you now that my boxes are running a 32-bit kernel, so
> > > > > the 64-bit-uncleanliness shouldn't apply to my boxes; however,
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.miquels.cistron.nl/linux/dpt_i2o-64bit-2.6.23.patch
> > > > >
> > > > > fixed the issue on my testbox.
> > > > >
> > > > > I took a clean 2.6.23, applied patch, recompiled the kernel, reboot: works.
> > > >
> > > > What a huge patch :(
> > > >
> > > > We already reverted the offening patch so I assume that 2.6.24-rc5 is
> > > > working for you?
> > > >
> > > > I guess we need to look at restoring "dpt_i2o: convert to SCSI hotplug
> > > > model" and then absorbing what Miquel has done there.
> > >
> > > This was just a patch I had lying around, if it worked it would confirm
> > > my suspicion, which it has.
> > >
> > > The minimal patch which is suitable for 2.6.23-stable and 2.6.24 would
> > > be the attached one-liner. The "dpt_i2o: convert to SCSI hotplug model"
> > > patch could be restored then.
> > >
> > > (if the list eats the attachment, it's also available here:
> > > http://www.miquels.cistron.nl/linux/linux-2.6.23+24-dpt_i2o-dma64.patch
> > > )
> > >
> > > Anders, does this one-liner patch work for you ?
> >
> > Got it - and it works!
> >
> > I took a clean 2.6.23, applied the patch, recompiled the kernel and
> > rebooted my testbox: came up with the fresh-compiled kernel
> > (verified by "uname -a").
> >
>
> That looks appropriate for 2.6.23.x:
>
> --- linux-2.6.23.9.orig/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c 2007-11-26 18:51:43.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.23.9/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c 2007-12-12 13:21:05.000000000 +0100
> @@ -905,8 +905,7 @@
> }
>
> pci_set_master(pDev);
> - if (pci_set_dma_mask(pDev, DMA_64BIT_MASK) &&
> - pci_set_dma_mask(pDev, DMA_32BIT_MASK))
> + if (pci_set_dma_mask(pDev, DMA_32BIT_MASK))
> return -EINVAL;
Yes, this has to be in ... the mptr filling the scatterlist on the
current driver is only a u32 and so will silently truncate.
> base_addr0_phys = pci_resource_start(pDev,0);
>
>
> However it is a bit mystifying that
> 55d9fcf57ba5ec427544fca7abc335cf3da78160 would cause a dma mask problem
> (isn't it?)
>
> The scsi people might want to restore
> 55d9fcf57ba5ec427544fca7abc335cf3da78160 and then apply Miquel's patch on
> top for 2.6.24, or do it for 2.6.25?
I think it's a bit late in the game for 2.6.24, so I'm happy to leave
the hotplug reverted. We'll try adding back hotplug plus this for
2.6.25 I think.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-12 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-12 10:58 broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2 check page: bad entry in directory) (fwd) Anders Henke
2007-12-12 11:38 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 13:07 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2007-12-12 13:43 ` Anders Henke
2007-12-12 19:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 19:54 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2007-12-12 22:16 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2007-12-13 10:11 ` [PATCH] dpt_i2o: don't set DMA_64BIT_MASK [was: Re: [stable] broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2 check page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)] Miquel van Smoorenburg
2007-12-13 12:58 ` James Bottomley
2007-12-12 14:17 ` broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2 check page: bad entry in directory) (fwd) Anders Henke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-29 13:03 broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: " Jan Kara
2007-11-29 14:55 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-11-29 16:45 ` Anders Henke
2007-11-29 17:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-11-30 13:27 ` Anders Henke
2007-11-29 17:09 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-11-30 10:34 ` Anders Henke
2007-12-11 14:40 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2007-12-11 21:53 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1197489294.4203.40.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anders.henke@1und1.de \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox