public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove 'e' from kprope structure members
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:08:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1197500913.21291.45.camel@brick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47606804.1010709@goop.org>

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:00 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > Some kprobe structure members had a superfluous e in their
> > name.
> >
> > eflags -> flags
> > esp -> sp
> >   
> 
> eflags and esp are the actual machine register names (at least in
> 32-bit), and therefore more distinctive than just "flags". 
> 
> If this is in preparation for a unification then OK, but I disagree if
> not (and technically 64-bit should be using rsp/rflags).
> 
>     J

My plan was to move forward with unifying these files.  If this is still
acceptable I will add a comment block documenting this.  This doesn't
affect anywhere outside of kprobes.h kprobes_32/64.c so if it is clean
to unify them, I'll leave them as sp with comment.

Harvey


  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-12 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1197421087.8761.27.camel@brick>
     [not found] ` <47602776.10408@zytor.com>
2007-12-12 19:27   ` [PATCH] x86: Remove 'e' from kprope structure members Harvey Harrison
2007-12-12 23:00     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-12 23:08       ` Harvey Harrison [this message]
2007-12-12 23:08       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-12 23:20         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-12 23:24           ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1197500913.21291.45.camel@brick \
    --to=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox