From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
niv@us.ibm.com, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
kernel@wantstofly.org, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v4 RCU: the bloatwatch edition
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 23:22:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11979.1241648574@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090506112459.5edd0902.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> More like "concerns". It's unobvious to me that the modest .text
> savings justify the costs of an additional RCU implementation. Where
> those costs include
It may be more than just modest .text savings. Being optimised to be as
simple as possible, and to only support one CPU, it may be quicker too. I'm
not sure how best to benchmark it though.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-06 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-02 16:34 [PATCH] v4 RCU: the bloatwatch edition Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-05 21:18 ` David Howells
2009-05-06 12:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 18:24 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-06 19:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-06 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-06 20:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-06 22:22 ` David Howells [this message]
2009-05-06 22:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-22 11:43 ` David Howells
2009-06-22 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-22 15:29 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-22 16:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-22 16:15 ` David Howells
2009-06-22 18:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-22 16:30 ` Darren Hart
2009-06-22 17:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-23 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-23 12:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11979.1241648574@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox